An independent advisor to the Court of Justice of the EU has come out in support of Intel in a review of a 2009 case, even as regulators elsewhere are cracking down on big tech. Credit: MixMagic / Getty Images Intel’s fight against a €1.06 billion ($1.2 billion) antitrust fine from the European Union (EU) got a boost Thursday when a top court advisor in Europe pointed out errors in the EU regulators’ economic analysis. The dispute started in 2009 when the European Commission penalized Intel for attempting to impede a competitor, Advanced Micro Devices, by giving rebates to Dell, Hewlett-Packard, NEC, and Lenovo for favoring Intel’s chips. The Intel decision is one in a series of increasing antitrust actions in Europe targeting technology companies. Regulators usually challenge rebates from leading companies due to their potential to restrict competition. However, companies have argued that authorities should demonstrate how these discounts are anti-competitive before imposing sanctions. In 2022, a subordinate court overturned the fine, prompting the EU competition commissioner to seek a review from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Luxembourg. CJEU Advocate General Laila Medina said in a statement that the court should dismiss the appeal. Medina cited issues with the commission’s “as-efficient competitor” test, designed to determine whether a company’s pricing was unfairly competitive compared to rivals with similar costs. The advocates general of the CJEU have an unusual role, providing independent, non-binding legal opinions on cases that the judges may then take into account in arriving at their decisions. Medina added, “…first, the General Court failed to have due regard to the Commission’s margin of discretion in complex economic matters. Second, it failed to take into account Intel’s implicit acknowledgment of the reference period during the administrative proceedings. Third, it infringed the Commission’s right of defense. Fourth, the General Court erred in relation to the appropriate conclusion to be drawn in respect of the entire period of the practice at issue.” The Intel ruling comes after a number of efforts meant to ensure fair competition in the EU. Google, owned by Alphabet, said this week, for example, that it will modify its online search results to better highlight comparison websites. The change is part of its efforts to adhere to new EU tech regulations under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which goes into effect in March. According to the DMA, the company must rank rival services and products on an equal footing with its own in search results. Related content opinion AI and AR can supercharge ‘ambient computing’ A 33-year-old vision is now fully realizable thanks to the coming ubiquity of generative AI and augmented reality (AR) glasses. By Mike Elgan Aug 16, 2024 7 mins Augmented Reality Technology Industry Virtual Reality opinion Agentic RAG AI — more marketing hype than tech advance CIOs are so desperate to stop generative AI hallucinations they’ll believe anything. Unfortunately, Agentic RAG isn’t new and its abilities are exaggerated. By Evan Schuman Aug 16, 2024 5 mins Technology Industry Generative AI Emerging Technology news Researchers tackle AI fact-checking failures with new LLM training technique Deductive Closure Training (DCT) looks to address the problems of LLM bias, misleading information, and outright contradiction. By John E. Dunn Aug 15, 2024 4 mins Generative AI IBM Technology Industry news brief Hollywood unions OK AI-cloned voices in commercials But companies must first obtain consent from the actor for any ad that uses the digital voice copy. By Viktor Eriksson Aug 15, 2024 1 min Generative AI Technology Industry Podcasts Videos Resources Events SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER From our editors straight to your inbox Get started by entering your email address below. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe